senk1s
11-19 09:33 PM
https://www.vfs-usa.co.in/ApplnForms/RulesAndFees/VisaFees.aspx
this might help ...but you might have already looked at this while scheduling an appointment
this might help ...but you might have already looked at this while scheduling an appointment
wallpaper Kristen Jaymes Stewart was
webm
08-14 05:00 PM
Actually your Initial filed Labor Application/approval notice or attorney can help you identify on this piece of Info.
Invis
06-27 01:15 PM
I first off apologize if there is already a thread pertaining to my questions. If so I would greatly appreciate being directed.
My situation is this...I came to the US as a visitor from Canada. As a result I did not need a I-94, a visa or a passport since i travelled by car. I am going to be married to a US citizen in a couple of weeks. I guess my questions are these...#1. Since I did not need any of those documents to enter the US, will this cause a problem while trying to prove status?
#2. I read somewhere about filing a I-30 prior to other documentation such as the I-485 and medical and so on. I was wondering if this is true or if i even need to file this document or if so if it can be filed in conjunction with the others.
My situation is this...I came to the US as a visitor from Canada. As a result I did not need a I-94, a visa or a passport since i travelled by car. I am going to be married to a US citizen in a couple of weeks. I guess my questions are these...#1. Since I did not need any of those documents to enter the US, will this cause a problem while trying to prove status?
#2. I read somewhere about filing a I-30 prior to other documentation such as the I-485 and medical and so on. I was wondering if this is true or if i even need to file this document or if so if it can be filed in conjunction with the others.
2011 rother Cameron Stewart,
aroranuj
10-26 04:14 PM
Hello,
My original I-140 in the EB3 skilled category was denied by the TSC & is pending @ AAO because the attorney's cover letter asked for the application to considered in the professional category, instead of the skilled category.
I have been told that while that I-140 is pending at AAO I can file a new I-140 under the "Other" category &they will adjudicate that case on the same Lobor Certification. Is that accurate for the TSC?
We will also file another EB3 Skilled category I-140 which obviously will be kept in abeyance till the AAO rules on my original application.
Can an attorney please advise if I can have 2 I -140's on the same Labor Certification for different categories?
Thanks.
My original I-140 in the EB3 skilled category was denied by the TSC & is pending @ AAO because the attorney's cover letter asked for the application to considered in the professional category, instead of the skilled category.
I have been told that while that I-140 is pending at AAO I can file a new I-140 under the "Other" category &they will adjudicate that case on the same Lobor Certification. Is that accurate for the TSC?
We will also file another EB3 Skilled category I-140 which obviously will be kept in abeyance till the AAO rules on my original application.
Can an attorney please advise if I can have 2 I -140's on the same Labor Certification for different categories?
Thanks.
more...
Macaca
05-25 08:10 PM
Making History, Reluctantly (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/24/AR2007052402069.html) In a Hill Anomaly, Pelosi Shepherds Iraq Bill She Opposes, By Jonathan Weisman (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/jonathan+weisman/) Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, May 25, 2007
In public, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had done nothing to suppress her frustration as she assented to funding the Iraq war without a deadline to end it. But behind closed doors Wednesday night, she was all business.
With its members gathered in her office, she told the House's "Progressive Caucus" that she would vote against the war funding bill, but that she also had no choice but to facilitate its passage. Funds were running out for the troops, and she had promised to protect them. The Memorial Day break loomed, and without the money President Bush would have a week to hammer her party for taking a vacation while the Pentagon scrambled to keep its soldiers fed.
Was she agonized over the situation? Sure, said Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey (D-N.Y.), who attended the meeting. But "we all feel that way," he added. "I feel that way, too. Are we going to just walk away now, or are we going to continue this process, to keep the pressure on?"
Yesterday's vote to fund the war through September was a historical rarity: the passage of a bill opposed by the speaker of the House and a majority of the speaker's party.
Two years ago to the day, then-Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) violated the "Hastert rule" -- that only bills supported by a majority of the majority can come up -- by bringing up legislation to allow federal funding for stem cell research. The majority of the Republican majority opposed the law. He voted against it, but he knew it would never become law over President Bush's signature.
Over his objections and the opposition of most Republicans, Hastert did allow passage of campaign finance reform in 2002, but only because a petition drive was about to force the bill to the floor. The North American Free Trade Agreement passed in 1993, over the objections of most Democrats, who were then in the majority. But NAFTA did have the support of then-Speaker Thomas S. Foley (D-Wash.), as well as the Democratic president, Bill Clinton.
In contrast, the Iraq funding bill was not only opposed by the majority of House Democrats, it was also ardently opposed by the speaker and even the lawmaker who drafted it, Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.). And it is destined to become law.
"We don't relish bringing a package to the floor that we're not going to vote for," Obey conceded before last night's vote.
Pelosi's agonized decision put her in the company of Foley, who in 1991 brought to the floor the resolution authorizing the Persian Gulf War and then voted against it, and Thomas Brackett Reed, a speaker in the 1890s who voted against the annexation of Hawaii, and then against the Spanish-American War, but allowed both to go forward.
"To have the chairman and the speaker vote against a bill like this, I've never heard of it," Hastert said.
But while protesters outside the Capitol condemned what they saw as a capitulation, Democrats inside were remarkably understanding of their speaker's contortions.
Party leaders jury-rigged the votes yesterday to give all Democrats something to brag about. A parliamentary vote to bring the Iraq funding legislation to the floor included language demanding a showdown vote in September over further funding. A second vote allowed Democrats to vote in favor of funds for Gulf Coast hurricane recovery, agricultural drought relief and children's health insurance. Finally, the House got around to funding the war.
Republicans cried foul over what they saw as an abuse of the legislative system, but Democrats saw brilliance in the legerdemain. And with such contortions came more appreciation for the efforts Pelosi was making to fund the war in a fashion most palatable to angry Democrats.
"It was the responsible thing to do, and she's a responsible speaker," said Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-Calif.), who is personally close to Pelosi. "You can't just walk away."
In public, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had done nothing to suppress her frustration as she assented to funding the Iraq war without a deadline to end it. But behind closed doors Wednesday night, she was all business.
With its members gathered in her office, she told the House's "Progressive Caucus" that she would vote against the war funding bill, but that she also had no choice but to facilitate its passage. Funds were running out for the troops, and she had promised to protect them. The Memorial Day break loomed, and without the money President Bush would have a week to hammer her party for taking a vacation while the Pentagon scrambled to keep its soldiers fed.
Was she agonized over the situation? Sure, said Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey (D-N.Y.), who attended the meeting. But "we all feel that way," he added. "I feel that way, too. Are we going to just walk away now, or are we going to continue this process, to keep the pressure on?"
Yesterday's vote to fund the war through September was a historical rarity: the passage of a bill opposed by the speaker of the House and a majority of the speaker's party.
Two years ago to the day, then-Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) violated the "Hastert rule" -- that only bills supported by a majority of the majority can come up -- by bringing up legislation to allow federal funding for stem cell research. The majority of the Republican majority opposed the law. He voted against it, but he knew it would never become law over President Bush's signature.
Over his objections and the opposition of most Republicans, Hastert did allow passage of campaign finance reform in 2002, but only because a petition drive was about to force the bill to the floor. The North American Free Trade Agreement passed in 1993, over the objections of most Democrats, who were then in the majority. But NAFTA did have the support of then-Speaker Thomas S. Foley (D-Wash.), as well as the Democratic president, Bill Clinton.
In contrast, the Iraq funding bill was not only opposed by the majority of House Democrats, it was also ardently opposed by the speaker and even the lawmaker who drafted it, Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.). And it is destined to become law.
"We don't relish bringing a package to the floor that we're not going to vote for," Obey conceded before last night's vote.
Pelosi's agonized decision put her in the company of Foley, who in 1991 brought to the floor the resolution authorizing the Persian Gulf War and then voted against it, and Thomas Brackett Reed, a speaker in the 1890s who voted against the annexation of Hawaii, and then against the Spanish-American War, but allowed both to go forward.
"To have the chairman and the speaker vote against a bill like this, I've never heard of it," Hastert said.
But while protesters outside the Capitol condemned what they saw as a capitulation, Democrats inside were remarkably understanding of their speaker's contortions.
Party leaders jury-rigged the votes yesterday to give all Democrats something to brag about. A parliamentary vote to bring the Iraq funding legislation to the floor included language demanding a showdown vote in September over further funding. A second vote allowed Democrats to vote in favor of funds for Gulf Coast hurricane recovery, agricultural drought relief and children's health insurance. Finally, the House got around to funding the war.
Republicans cried foul over what they saw as an abuse of the legislative system, but Democrats saw brilliance in the legerdemain. And with such contortions came more appreciation for the efforts Pelosi was making to fund the war in a fashion most palatable to angry Democrats.
"It was the responsible thing to do, and she's a responsible speaker," said Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-Calif.), who is personally close to Pelosi. "You can't just walk away."
wandmaker
10-14 10:42 AM
YES, (1) in the same line of specialty area (2) and full time & part time employer should permit taking up another job (ie. some employers ask you to sign a agreement not to work for another employer during the employment with them)
more...
cr52401
01-26 10:04 AM
Guys,
I am going to apply for Eb2. I already have Eb3 approved with the company that I am currently working. The other brand new company is offering me Eb2 with Perm but they don�t have any master degree in the company and also they have a very dummy attorney. I am not joining them until I can file 485 and make sure that I would not lose my PD.
I am form rest of the word category and the Eb2 in current.
Can some one help me with the ad text for Industrial engineer with +6 years of experience. The attorney doesn�t have any clue about Eb2 and specific add in paper. I guess I am going to help her.
I really appreciate your help. I just need to get some help from you guys to make sure I have the add cover correctly
I am going to apply for Eb2. I already have Eb3 approved with the company that I am currently working. The other brand new company is offering me Eb2 with Perm but they don�t have any master degree in the company and also they have a very dummy attorney. I am not joining them until I can file 485 and make sure that I would not lose my PD.
I am form rest of the word category and the Eb2 in current.
Can some one help me with the ad text for Industrial engineer with +6 years of experience. The attorney doesn�t have any clue about Eb2 and specific add in paper. I guess I am going to help her.
I really appreciate your help. I just need to get some help from you guys to make sure I have the add cover correctly
2010 Stewart has an older rother
gc??
04-28 02:01 PM
Read this else where, about I -140s being reopened and labor certification are being questioned. Is this true?
more...
tabletpc
01-10 03:17 PM
can anyone give some suggestions on this..!!!
Thanks
Thanks
hair Kristen Stewart Brother
hopelessGC
08-10 01:58 PM
Hi all,
I need some good advice and facts...
My friend's H1-B extension is approved but the stamping (Mumbai consulate) might get denied due to a previous (dismissed) charge for driving with suspended license.
What are the options after that? Can he re-apply for the visa stamping again using the same H1-B approval petition? Can we appeal the decision since it document clearly states that the fine was paid?
Please advise.
I need some good advice and facts...
My friend's H1-B extension is approved but the stamping (Mumbai consulate) might get denied due to a previous (dismissed) charge for driving with suspended license.
What are the options after that? Can he re-apply for the visa stamping again using the same H1-B approval petition? Can we appeal the decision since it document clearly states that the fine was paid?
Please advise.
more...
waitin_toolong
11-13 01:43 PM
not a problem
hot Kristen%20Stewart%20Blonde.jpg
schumy_micheal
06-02 08:54 PM
Found this article in Huff Post. Looks like GOP is waking up and IV should support this initiative. First time hearing "Legal Immigration" not being mixed with other "Types".:)
House GOP Hints At Immigration Reform For Skilled Workers (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/02/republicans-house-immigration-reform-skilled-workers_n_870600.html)
House GOP Hints At Immigration Reform For Skilled Workers (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/02/republicans-house-immigration-reform-skilled-workers_n_870600.html)
more...
house Kristen Stewart Biography News
Blog Feeds
09-09 07:30 PM
This is a major setback for the antis and for Kris Kobach, the architect of these laws who has assured city councils that these laws are designed to withstand legal challenges. From the ACLU: This is a major setback for the antis. From the ACLU: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit today issued a sweeping decision striking down as unconstitutional the city of Hazleton's law that would punish landlords and employers who are accused of renting to or hiring anyone the city classifies as an "illegal alien." The case, Lozano v. Hazleton, has been closely watched across...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/09/appeals-court-strikes-down-hazleton-pa-law.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/09/appeals-court-strikes-down-hazleton-pa-law.html)
tattoo Kristen Stewart on Robert
Vagus
01-09 03:05 PM
Did you get RFE on renewal or applying for the first time. Did you do E filing of application.
more...
pictures kristen stewart hot
jasonpark
August 17th, 2005, 03:18 PM
Monarch
dresses and Kristen Stewart#39;S
p_t_smiles
June 1st, 2005, 06:57 PM
Here are some of my earlier pictures with my Kodak Easyshare. Look forward to comments and critisism.
Thanks,
Tracey
Thanks,
Tracey
more...
makeup Kristen Stewart amp; Cameron
KarachiWala
12-12 07:26 PM
go ahead Brainiacs..
Correct me I am wrong here:
AP allows you to enter US without a valid visa.
EAD allows you to work in US for any employer.
Untill and unless someone utlizes his EAD, he is still on H1 (if he has valid H1) doesn't matter he enters US using AP. Am I correct?
Then question arrises, If H1 holder changes his job then he needs to transfer his H1 only and not use EAD. Is this possible to have H1 renewed and transfered even though one has EAD approved, meaning is it compulsory to use EAD one you get it?
Rgds
KarachiWala
Correct me I am wrong here:
AP allows you to enter US without a valid visa.
EAD allows you to work in US for any employer.
Untill and unless someone utlizes his EAD, he is still on H1 (if he has valid H1) doesn't matter he enters US using AP. Am I correct?
Then question arrises, If H1 holder changes his job then he needs to transfer his H1 only and not use EAD. Is this possible to have H1 renewed and transfered even though one has EAD approved, meaning is it compulsory to use EAD one you get it?
Rgds
KarachiWala
girlfriend Taylor and Cameron Stewart…
Hydra
09-02 02:41 PM
Hi people :angel: , i'm new of this site so i would like you see my new and first stamp for kirupa!
Please tell me what do you think about !!!
...Lot of Thanks ! :thumb:
Please tell me what do you think about !!!
...Lot of Thanks ! :thumb:
hairstyles kristen stewart hot wallpaper.
sanjay02
06-11 11:39 AM
You should inform USCIS of the address change within 10 days. See AR-11 form on USCIS website for further details.
vivache
06-21 11:58 PM
When I got back from overseas travel this time, at San Francisco, the Customs person took both my AP's and stamped one and gave it back to me and kept the other with him.
I remember previously when I had two AP's one was stamped and the other was returned unstamped.
My AP was multiple entry both times.
I need top travel again next month. Any idea if I can travel on my current stamped AP or there is a problem.
Thanks
V
I remember previously when I had two AP's one was stamped and the other was returned unstamped.
My AP was multiple entry both times.
I need top travel again next month. Any idea if I can travel on my current stamped AP or there is a problem.
Thanks
V
saibaba
12-18 03:43 PM
No, just what is asked in the RFE. Your atterney will handle it.
thanq brother..
will try to get new pics rightaway and will send them to attorney...
thanq brother..
will try to get new pics rightaway and will send them to attorney...
No comments:
Post a Comment